Free Newsletter
Cisco's TANDBERG purchase rejected by shareholders
Hold your horses, mergers and acquisitions fans. It looks like Cisco's march to control every segment of IP communications has been stopped in its tracks. TANDBERG's shareholders--who own just over 24 percent of the video conferencing technology provider--have rejected Cisco's $3 billion bid as too small.
Cisco needs 90 percent of TANDBERG's shareholders to approve its bid and analysts believe that it can afford to sweeten the deal. The market premium of Cisco's offer was only 11 percent, and although Cisco maintains its bid was a fair offer, shareholders have described it as inadequate. Shareholders seem to want Cisco CEO John Chambers to put more money behind his earnings call claim: "We continue to believe that video architecture is the most important Web 2.0 next-generation play."
It was reported that Cisco Systems bought TANDBERG for $3 billion on Oct. 1, in an attempt to bring more video technology in house, but it seems like the deal was not yet approved by all the parties involved. TANDBERG's products are less expensive than Cisco's high-end Telepresence gear, so Cisco will add market spectrum by acquiring TANDBERG.
Read more:
- check out this Reuters story
Related articles
Cisco buys TANDBERG for $3B
How will the Cisco/Tandberg purchase affect Polycom?
Cisco CEO: Video most important next-gen play
TANDBERG pitches telepresence to specific verticals
Cisco expects online video to drive global traffic increase
More stories about Cisco IP communications Video Technology Tandberg Video Conferencing Equipment Merger And Acquisition
Comments
Posted by Anonymous | October 16, 2009 - 5:42pm
I'm sorry. What competitor ISN'T cheaper than anything Cisco offers?
Posted by Anonymous | October 16, 2009 - 7:08pm
Cisco is the Unified Communications leader for a reason. Most customers don't buy on price alone.
Posted by Anonymous | October 16, 2009 - 10:05pm
Cicso might not be cheaper up front but their products seem to have longer lifecycles than others. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the GSR has been chugging along since the mid 90s. I'd much rather purchase technology with a healthy and long roadmap than rip and replace every +/- five years.
Posted by Anonymous | October 16, 2009 - 11:59pm
I work for Tandberg; our products are more expensive than Cisco's (but not by much). We are also the industry leader (at over 43% market share)
SHARE
WITH:
Comments (4) | Post a comment