Free Newsletter
WiFi doesn't mean VoIP freedom


Last week, FierceVoIP reported the introduction of the Nokia 6301, a handset capable of handing off live calls between cell and WiFi networks by means of unlicensed mobile access, or "UMA." I wrote that it was "reported to be one of a handful of UMA phones, given the potential for them to eat into the lucrative wireless business model."
In response, I received a correspondence from one Steve Shaw from Kineto Wireless in Milpitas, Calif. Mr. Shaw put me straight on the capabilities of UMA. He writes: "We are the primary evangelists behind UMA, the global standard for mobile/WiFi convergence. It is certainly exciting that Nokia releases their third UMA phone last week. But I wanted to offer one comment on how/why a UMA-enabled phone is different than any other dual-mode device.
"UMA actually lets the mobile operator maintain control of services when the subscriber is on WiFi. When a subscriber walks into the home (WiFi location), the phone establishes an IPSec tunnel from the phone to the mobile network. Now all services (voice, data, IMS) are tunneled to/from the phone over the WiFi radio. In fact, the GSM radio is actually turned off when a UMA phone is in WiFi mode. With UMA, subscribers get exactly the same mobile experience, it's just that it runs over WiFi, and mobile operators have the same control of subscribers just like they are on the GSM network.
"UMA is the only technology which makes WiFi friendly to the mobile operator. Products like the Nokia E51 (which was also mentioned) aren't particularly friendly to mobile operators. With a UMA phone, mobile operators can still bill for services (calls, SMS, MMS ...) over WiFi just like over the GSM network. With an E51 (or any non-UMA dual-mode phone like the iPhone), mobile operators can't bill for anything a subscriber does over WiFi."
Mr. Shaw states further that T-Mobile's HotSpot@Home, Orange, Telecom Italia, BT, Telia Sonera and Cincinnati Bell's HomeRun service use UMA.
A) I stand gratefully corrected, and B) I very much appreciate all feedback and observations. Please drop me a line at dmcadams@fiercemarkets.com.
Comments
Friendly to mobile operators? Why should I care to be friendly to them? UMA offers little to nothing to the consumer if it is still going to incur airtime charges. I currently use a Nokia E61 (imported and unlocked) _because_ it gives me the ability to use Wi-Fi and my VoIP and PBX services, with no additional fees, from my home or any open hotspot. If I want or need to hand the call off to the carrier, I just transfer the call accordingly. So I have to think a bit. No big deal. Price air-time and data plans in Canada and you'll understand!
If any carriers think that I'm going to pay them for the privilege of them using my network and internet connection, they are sadly mistaken! Certainly not full or even half rate. Bill me for using Wi-Fi? Heck no! There may be a small percentage of customers out there that might be willing to, for their own reasons, but not enough to justify the infrastructure expense to the carriers. The carriers would be better off improving their networks to provide good coverage so a UMA hand-off isn't needed...
Dave
Hi, Dave, and thanks for that comment re Canadian air/date rates..!
Is your Nokia E61 still operating as well on WiFi as when you wrote that comment? I plan to buy one...
Thanks
John B
Dear Dave,
Perhaps UMA is the camel's nose...
Deborah



Comments (3) | Post a comment